Commissioner of the General Land Office
The incumbent, Dawn Buckingham, served in the Texas Senate before taking this office; her Senate votes for the 2019 bill creating the state’s hemp programme and for two Compassionate-Use expansions are listed below. Benjamin Flores has published a position on the 2026 hemp restrictions on his campaign site. No record was found for Neill Snider.
How this score is worked out
Seven kinds of act move this number, and they do not count equally. A recorded vote counts 3, and so does authoring a bill or signing an executive action; signing on to somebody else’s bill counts 2. A statement or a questionnaire answer counts 2 as well, and an organisational endorsement counts 1. A vote takes its direction from the bill, whose effect is set out in advance; the rest take it from our reading of what was said, and each one below shows that reading and the reason for it. Acts shown with no number were examined and deliberately left out of the arithmetic, with a reason given.
- 2021-05-25 Low-THC cannabis for more conditions HB 1535 — signed on, counted as +1 at weight 1.8
- 2021-05-25 Low-THC cannabis for more conditions HB 1535 — voted, counted as +1 at weight 1.8
- 2021-05-24 Defence to prosecution for small amounts HB 1694 — voted, counted as +1 at weight 1.8
- 2021-05-21 Penalties for tetrahydrocannabinols HB 2593 — voted, counted as +2 at weight 1.8
- 2021-05-21 Penalties for tetrahydrocannabinols HB 2593 — voted, counted as +2 at weight 1.8
- 2019-05-22 Low-THC cannabis for more conditions HB 3703 — voted, counted as +1 at weight 0.9
Average on the −2 to +2 scale: 1.364. Full method and the bill table.
-
Vote2019-05-15
Voted Yea as the Texas Senate passed CSHB 1325, the bill bringing Texas into line with the federal hemp definition and creating the state's licensed hemp programme, on third reading by Yeas 31, Nays 0.
⚠️The journal prints only The tally for this vote, not a name-by-name roll. The Texas Senate has exactly 31 members, so 31 yeas is every seated member, and she is recorded present in that day's opening roll call. Her vote is deduced from those two facts rather than read off a printed list.
WeedVoter’s note — shown here, but not counted in the score: This site deliberately does not score HB 1325 (86th Legislature), so a record on it moves no number.
Why HB 1325 is not scored
Production and regulation of hemp — the 2019 bill that brought Texas into line with the federal hemp definition. It is an agricultural and licensing framework rather than an access measure, and it is read the same way as the other hemp-production bills here, so it is not scored. Its votes are still shown.
-
Vote2019-05-15
Texas Senate: recorded Yea on the passage of CSHB 1325 to third reading, the 2019 bill on the production and regulation of hemp that brought Texas into line with the federal hemp definition and created the state's licensed hemp programme. The Senate Journal prints: "CSHB 1325 as amended was passed to third reading by a viva voce vote. All Members are deemed to have voted "Yea" on the passage to third reading."
⚠️The journal prints only the tally for this vote and no name-by-name roll. The Texas Senate has 31 members, the journal's opening roll for 15 May 2019 names 31 senators present, and the yeas equal that number, so every senator present is recorded as voting Yea. This attribution is deduced from the size of the chamber and the day's presence roll, not read off a printed list of names.
WeedVoter’s note — shown here, but not counted in the score: This site deliberately does not score HB 1325 (86th Legislature), so a record on it moves no number.
Why HB 1325 is not scored
Production and regulation of hemp — the 2019 bill that brought Texas into line with the federal hemp definition. It is an agricultural and licensing framework rather than an access measure, and it is read the same way as the other hemp-production bills here, so it is not scored. Its votes are still shown.
-
Vote2019-05-15
Texas Senate: recorded Yea on the motion to suspend Senate Rule 7.18 and the constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several days, so that CSHB 1325 could be placed on its third reading and final passage the same day; CSHB 1325 is the 2019 bill on the production and regulation of hemp. The motion, made by Senator Perry, prevailed 31 Yeas to 0 Nays. This is a procedural vote; the third-reading passage that followed it is listed separately.
⚠️The journal prints only the tally for this vote. The Texas Senate has 31 members and the Yeas number 31, so every senator is recorded as voting Yea. This attribution is deduced from the size of the chamber, not read off a printed list of names.
WeedVoter’s note — shown here, but not counted in the score: This site deliberately does not score HB 1325 (86th Legislature), so a record on it moves no number.
Why HB 1325 is not scored
Production and regulation of hemp — the 2019 bill that brought Texas into line with the federal hemp definition. It is an agricultural and licensing framework rather than an access measure, and it is read the same way as the other hemp-production bills here, so it is not scored. Its votes are still shown.
-
Vote2019-05-22
Voted Yea as the Texas Senate passed CSHB 3703, widening the medical conditions for which physicians may prescribe low-THC cannabis under the Compassionate-Use Program, on third reading by Yeas 31, Nays 0.
⚠️The journal prints only the tally for this vote. The Senate has exactly 31 members, so 31 yeas is every seated member, and she is named in the Yeas of a separate recorded vote taken the same day, which places her in the chamber. Her vote is deduced from those facts rather than read off a printed list.
-
Vote2019-05-22
Texas Senate: recorded Yea on the motion to suspend Senate Rule 7.18 and the constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several days, so that CSHB 3703 could be placed on its third reading and final passage the same day; CSHB 3703 is the 2019 bill widening the medical conditions for which low-THC cannabis may be prescribed under the Compassionate-Use Program. The motion, made by Senator Campbell, prevailed 31 Yeas to 0 Nays.
This is a procedural vote; the third-reading passage that followed it is listed separately.
⚠️The journal prints only the tally for this vote. The Texas Senate has 31 members and the Yeas number 31, so every senator is recorded as voting Yea. This attribution is deduced from the size of the chamber, not read off a printed list of names.
WeedVoter’s note — shown here, but not counted in the score: This site does not score procedural motions, such as suspending a rule, postponing, recommitting or reconsidering, because such a motion decides how a bill is handled rather than what it does, and its scoring rules read this record as one.
-
Vote2021-05-21
Texas Senate: recorded Yea, and named in the printed Yeas roll, on final passage of HB 2593 as amended, moving possession of tetrahydrocannabinols into a new penalty group whose lowest tiers are misdemeanors, out of one where any amount is a felony. The Journal records the vote as 24 Yeas, 7 Nays.
-
Vote2021-05-21
Texas Senate: recorded Yea, and named in the printed Yeas roll, on the motion to suspend the regular order of business to take up HB 2593 on its second reading; HB 2593 is the 2021 bill moving possession of tetrahydrocannabinols into a new penalty group whose lowest tiers are misdemeanors, out of one where any amount is a felony. The motion, made by Senator Johnson, prevailed 24 Yeas to 7 Nays. This is the procedural vote that brought the bill up; the passage to third reading that followed it, and the final passage, are listed separately.
WeedVoter’s note — shown here, but not counted in the score: This site does not score procedural motions, such as suspending a rule, postponing, recommitting or reconsidering, because such a motion decides how a bill is handled rather than what it does, and its scoring rules read this record as one.
-
Vote2021-05-21
Texas Senate: recorded Yea on the passage of HB 2593 to third reading on its second reading, the 2021 bill moving possession of tetrahydrocannabinols into a new penalty group whose lowest tiers are misdemeanors, out of one where any amount is a felony, which carried 24 Yeas to 7 Nays. The Senate Journal records this vote as the same as the previous roll call, the one taken moments earlier to bring the bill up, in which this member is named in the printed Yeas roll.
Final passage the same day is listed separately.
-
Vote2021-05-21
Texas Senate: recorded Yea, and named in the printed Yeas roll, on the motion to suspend Senate Rule 7.18 and the constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several days, so that HB 2593 could be placed on its third reading and final passage the same day; HB 2593 is the 2021 bill moving possession of tetrahydrocannabinols into a new penalty group whose lowest tiers are misdemeanors, out of one where any amount is a felony.
The motion, made by Senator Johnson, prevailed 25 Yeas to 6 Nays. This is a procedural vote; the third-reading passage that followed it is listed separately.
WeedVoter’s note — shown here, but not counted in the score: This site does not score procedural motions, such as suspending a rule, postponing, recommitting or reconsidering, because such a motion decides how a bill is handled rather than what it does, and its scoring rules read this record as one.
-
Vote2021-05-24
Texas Senate: recorded Yea on the third-reading passage of HB 1694, creating a defence to prosecution for small-amount possession when a person seeks emergency help for an overdose, which carried 30 Yeas to 0 Nays with one member absent-excused.
⚠️The journal prints only the tally for this vote. The Texas Senate has 31 members, the journal names one member absent-excused (Senator Creighton) and names the other 30 in the day's opening presence roll, and the yeas equal that number, so every senator present is recorded as voting Yea. This attribution is deduced from the size of the chamber and the day's presence roll, not read off a printed list of names.
-
Vote2021-05-24
Texas Senate: recorded Yea on the motion to suspend Senate Rule 7.18 and the constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several days, so that HB 1694 could be placed on its third reading and final passage the same day; HB 1694 is the 2021 bill creating a defence to prosecution for small-amount possession when a person seeks emergency help for an overdose. The motion, made by Senator Schwertner, prevailed 30 Yeas to 0 Nays, with Senator Creighton absent-excused.
This is a procedural vote; the third-reading passage that followed it is listed separately.
⚠️The journal prints no list of Yeas for this vote; it names only the absent member. The Texas Senate has 31 members, and 30 Yeas, 0 Nays and the one named absence account for all of them, so every senator other than the absent member is recorded as voting Yea. This attribution is deduced from the size of the chamber and the named absence, not read off a printed list of names.
WeedVoter’s note — shown here, but not counted in the score: This site does not score procedural motions, such as suspending a rule, postponing, recommitting or reconsidering, because such a motion decides how a bill is handled rather than what it does, and its scoring rules read this record as one.
-
Authored2021-05-25
Was added by name as a Senate co-sponsor of HB 1535, the 2021 Compassionate-Use expansion. The Senate Journal records that on motion of Senator Schwertner, Senators Alvarado, Blanco, Buckingham, Campbell, Eckhardt, Gutierrez, Hinojosa, Johnson, Menendez, Nelson, Seliger and Whitmire would be shown as co-sponsors. This is a name-level record.
-
Vote2021-05-25
Voted Yea the same evening as the Texas Senate passed CSHB 1535 on third reading by Yeas 31, Nays 0.
⚠️The journal prints only The tally for this vote. The Senate has exactly 31 members, so 31 yeas is every seated member, and she is recorded present in that day's opening roll call. Her vote is deduced from those facts rather than read off a printed list.
-
Vote2021-05-25
Texas Senate: recorded Yea on the motion to suspend Senate Rule 7.18 and the constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several days, so that CSHB 1535 could be placed on its third reading and final passage the same day; CSHB 1535 is the 2021 bill widening the medical conditions qualifying for low-THC cannabis under the Compassionate-Use Program. The motion, made by Senator Schwertner, prevailed 31 Yeas to 0 Nays.
This is a procedural vote; the third-reading passage that followed it is listed separately.
⚠️The journal prints only the tally for this vote. The Texas Senate has 31 members and the Yeas number 31, so every senator is recorded as voting Yea. This attribution is deduced from the size of the chamber, not read off a printed list of names.
WeedVoter’s note — shown here, but not counted in the score: This site does not score procedural motions, such as suspending a rule, postponing, recommitting or reconsidering, because such a motion decides how a bill is handled rather than what it does, and its scoring rules read this record as one.
-
Vote2021-05-26
Texas Senate: recorded Yea on the passage of CSHB 3948 to third reading, on the production and regulation of hemp and consumable hemp products. The Senate Journal prints: "CSHB 3948 as amended was passed to third reading by a viva voce vote. All Members are deemed to have voted "Yea" on the passage to third reading except as follows: Nays: Johnson."
⚠️The journal prints no list of yeas for this vote; it names only the single dissenter. The Texas Senate has 31 members, all 31 are recorded voting on the suspension motion taken immediately before, and the tally accounts for all 31, so every senator other than the named Nay is recorded as voting Yea. This attribution is deduced from the size of the chamber and the named exception, not read off a printed list of names.
WeedVoter’s note — shown here, but not counted in the score: This site deliberately does not score HB 3948 (87th Legislature), so a record on it moves no number.
Why HB 3948 is not scored
Hemp and consumable hemp production and regulation. Read as an industry framework rather than an access measure; the direction is arguable, so it is not scored.
journals.senate.texas.gov, journals.senate.texas.gov, capitol.texas.gov
-
Vote2021-05-26
Texas Senate: recorded Yea on the third reading and final passage of CSHB 3948, on the production and regulation of hemp and consumable hemp products, which carried 30 Yeas to 1 Nay. The Senate Journal prints: "The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 30, Nays 1. Nays: Johnson."
⚠️The journal prints no list of yeas for this vote; it names only the single dissenter. The Texas Senate has 31 members, all 31 are recorded voting on the suspension motion taken immediately before, and the tally accounts for all 31, so every senator other than the named Nay is recorded as voting Yea. This attribution is deduced from the size of the chamber and the named exception, not read off a printed list of names.
WeedVoter’s note — shown here, but not counted in the score: This site deliberately does not score HB 3948 (87th Legislature), so a record on it moves no number.
Why HB 3948 is not scored
Hemp and consumable hemp production and regulation. Read as an industry framework rather than an access measure; the direction is arguable, so it is not scored.
journals.senate.texas.gov, journals.senate.texas.gov, capitol.texas.gov
-
Vote2021-05-26
Texas Senate: recorded Yea on the motion to suspend Senate Rule 7.18 and the constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several days, so that CSHB 3948 could be placed on its third reading and final passage the same day; CSHB 3948 is the 2021 bill on the production and regulation of hemp and consumable hemp products. The motion, made by Senator Perry, prevailed 31 Yeas to 0 Nays. This is a procedural vote; the third-reading passage that followed it is listed separately.
⚠️The journal prints only the tally for this vote. The Texas Senate has 31 members and the Yeas number 31, so every senator is recorded as voting Yea. This attribution is deduced from the size of the chamber, not read off a printed list of names.
WeedVoter’s note — shown here, but not counted in the score: This site deliberately does not score HB 3948 (87th Legislature), so a record on it moves no number.
Why HB 3948 is not scored
Hemp and consumable hemp production and regulation. Read as an industry framework rather than an access measure; the direction is arguable, so it is not scored.
How this score is worked out
Seven kinds of act move this number, and they do not count equally. A recorded vote counts 3, and so does authoring a bill or signing an executive action; signing on to somebody else’s bill counts 2. A statement or a questionnaire answer counts 2 as well, and an organisational endorsement counts 1. A vote takes its direction from the bill, whose effect is set out in advance; the rest take it from our reading of what was said, and each one below shows that reading and the reason for it. Acts shown with no number were examined and deliberately left out of the arithmetic, with a reason given.
- 2026-09-28 questionnaire — Answered "Strongly Support" on maintaining a legal, regulated hemp marketplace and "Yes" that regulation is preferable to prohibition, and wrote that the goal should be responsible regulation rather than prohibition, counted as +2 at weight 2
- 2026-09-20 statement — Opposes the hemp-THC ban and calls for keeping the products legal under testing, labelling and age rules. That is the same direction as a Nay on Senate Bill 3, which this site scores at the full expansive value, counted as +2 at weight 2
- 2026-09-20 statement — Support for research into the therapeutic potential of THC. Medical and research access, so it scores as a partial rather than an adult-use position, counted as +1 at weight 2
Average on the −2 to +2 scale: 1.667. Full method and the bill table.
-
Said2026-09-20
Asked on his campaign question-and-answer page what he thought of Texas effectively banning hemp on 31 July, he answered: "I believe adults should be able to buy tested, clearly labeled products without fear of sudden criminalization, and kids should be kept away from anything that can impair them." He argued that a ban hands the market to the underground rather than removing demand, drawing a comparison with alcohol prohibition, and concluded: "I support clear rules, quality standards, and age limits that keep products legal and out of the black market instead of driving them into it."
⚠️The page carries no publication date, so 2026-09-20 is the date it was read, not a publication date.
-
Said2026-09-20
On the same question-and-answer page, answering whether he would describe himself as progressive, he wrote: "I support responsible research into the therapeutic potential of THC and psilocybin."
⚠️The page carries no publication date, so 2026-09-20 is the date it was read.
-
Questionnaire2026-09-28
Said Texas "should have a legal, well-regulated hemp industry" and that the goal should be "responsible regulation, not prohibition", in the Texas Hemp Business Council’s 2026 candidate questionnaire. The council is a hemp industry trade association; it put twenty questions to 223 candidates for the Texas Legislature and statewide office and publishes the answers it receives in full, without editing. These are the candidate’s own words, submitted by the candidate.
Asked about the future of hemp in Texas, the answer was, in full: "Texas should have a legal, well-regulated hemp industry that protects consumers, supports farmers and small businesses, and respects the choices of responsible adults. I support a statewide framework built around age restrictions, independent product testing, accurate dosage and labeling, child-resistant packaging, reasonable licensing requirements, and strong enforcement against bad actors selling contaminated or unlawful products.
Fees and taxes should be proportionate and should not be used to price legitimate businesses out of the market. Texas farmers should also be encouraged to grow hemp as a lawful agricultural commodity that can diversify farm income and contribute to healthier crop rotations. Future policy should be driven by credible science, measurable public-health outcomes, and input from consumers, farmers, businesses, and medical experts.
The goal should be responsible regulation, not prohibition, while giving compliant Texas businesses clear and predictable rules." Asked who should be permitted to sell THC, to whom, at what dose, in what form and subject to what safeguards: "THC products should be sold only by licensed or properly registered businesses that comply with state testing, labeling, packaging, recordkeeping, and age-verification requirements.
For hemp-derived intoxicating products, sales should generally be limited to adults **21 and older**, while medical cannabis should remain available to qualifying patients through the appropriate medical program. Texas should establish reasonable per-serving and per-package dosage limits based on public-health evidence, product type, and consumer safety rather than using potency rules as a backdoor prohibition. Lower-dose products should remain available so adults can make informed choices and accurately control consumption.
Lawful forms such as edibles, beverages, tinctures, and other appropriately regulated products should be permitted so long as they meet applicable safety standards. Products should undergo independent testing for potency and contaminants, clearly disclose THC content and ingredients, use child-resistant packaging where appropriate, and avoid packaging or marketing designed to appeal to children. The goal should be straightforward: keep THC products out of the hands of minors, keep unsafe products off the market, give adult consumers accurate information, and allow responsible Texas businesses to operate within clear and enforceable rules."
Asked why regulation is or is not preferable to prohibition: "**Yes.** When a hemp-derived product can be produced and sold safely under a strong regulatory framework, regulation is preferable to an outright ban. Clear rules on testing, labeling, age restrictions, manufacturing standards, and enforcement can protect consumers while preserving a lawful market for Texas businesses and consumers. Blanket prohibition can eliminate legitimate businesses without necessarily eliminating demand.
A responsible regulatory approach gives the state better tools to enforce safety standards, hold bad actors accountable, and keep unsafe or mislabeled products off the market." On the questionnaire’s fixed-choice questions: on maintaining a legal, regulated hemp marketplace, "Strongly Support"; on whether regulation is preferable to prohibition where a product can be made and sold safely, "Yes"; on hemp agriculture, "Strongly Support"; on retail regulation, "No additional licensing beyond existing law"; on tax policy, "Yes"; on consumer choice, "Yes".
The council lists his office as "Texas Senate" and his district as "Texas Land Commissioner"; the race he is on the 2026 general-election ballot for is Commissioner of the General Land Office, which is what he typed in the district box, so this record is filed under that race. Some of his answers were typed with Markdown asterisks around the opening word; they are quoted here exactly as submitted. The date is the date the council recorded the submission, in Central time.
texashempbusinesscouncil.com, texashempbusinesscouncil.com, texashempbusinesscouncil.com, texashempbusinesscouncil.com
No record compiled yet. Nothing on cannabis — no vote, bill, statement or endorsement — was found in any source we could read. One limit on that search is recorded with it.
What was checked for Neill Snider, and the limits on it
Checked on 2026-09-18: searches for any cannabis, marijuana, THC or hemp statement returned nothing, and no campaign policy page could be located for him. He holds no Texas legislative office, so there is no roll call or bill authorship to search. The Libertarian Party platform addresses cannabis, but a party document is not an act by this candidate.
Also checked, and read in full on 2026-09-18: this candidate's Ballotpedia profile at ballotpedia.org/Neill_Snider, including any Candidate Connection survey answers published there, which contains no mention of cannabis, marijuana, hemp, THC or CBD.
Re-read independently on 2026-09-20: his San Antonio Report candidate profile and the Community Impact question-and-answer with the land commissioner candidates, which carries his own answers. None of these contains the word cannabis, marijuana, marihuana, hemp, THC or CBD.
Their Ballotpedia profile was read in full on 2026-09-20 at ballotpedia.org/Neill_Snider (11561 characters). It contains no occurrence of cannabis, marijuana, marihuana, hemp, THC, CBD, delta-8 or Compassionate Use. When we re-read their Ballotpedia profile on 2026-10-15, it still carried no Candidate Connection survey.
⚠️This card does not tell you whether this candidate held a seat in an earlier Legislature, but the question is now narrower. Read on 2026-10-15, from each chamber’s own journal: the roll of members-elect that the Texas House Journal prints, district by district, on the first day of every regular session from the 75th Legislature (1997) through the 89th (2025), and every senator the Texas Senate Journal names with a district on the first day of every regular session from the 76th (1999) through the 89th.
For the 89th those are journals.house.texas.gov/hjrnl/89r/pdf/89RDAY01FINAL.PDF and journals.senate.texas.gov/SJRNL/89R/HTML/89RSJ01-14-F.HTM and every journal read is listed on this site’s corrections page. No one by this candidate’s name appears in any of them. That is narrower than a negative answer. Those rolls name the members seated as each session opened, and in most years the Senate’s names the senators who were not up for election by surname alone, so a member who sat only in earlier sessions, who arrived at a special election and was never named in full on a later first day, or who served under another name would not be found this way.
If this candidate is one of those, there may be a cannabis voting record this site is missing.
Also checked, and read in full on 2026-10-06: this candidate’s own campaign site at www.voteneillsnider.com — 5 pages, reached from the home page’s own links and from the site’s sitemap.xml, each fetched only after its host’s robots.txt had been checked and found to permit it, 7,672 characters of text in all. The site is headed "Vote Neill Snider" and names the General Land Office. The extracted text of those pages contains no occurrence, on a word boundary, of cannabis, marijuana, marihuana, hemp, THC, CBD, Compassionate Use, delta-8, delta-9, dispensary, decriminalize, cannabinoid or psilocybin.
Re-read on 2026-10-16: his campaign site at www.voteneillsnider.com — every page its home page links to (Home, Additional, Get Involved, Donate), each HTTP 200 and robots-checked first; it publishes no sitemap. None contains cannabis, marijuana, marihuana, hemp, THC, CBD, delta-8, cannabinoid, dispensary, decriminalisation, psilocybin or Compassionate Use.
Re-read on 2026-10-17: his campaign site voteneillsnider.com, all 5 pages its home page links reach (home, Additional, Get Involved and Donate; it publishes no sitemap), every page HTTP 200, each fetched only after its robots.txt allowed that exact path, and scanned on word boundaries in both its visible text and its page source for cannabis, cannabinoid, marijuana, marihuana, hemp, THC, CBD, delta-8, delta-9, Compassionate Use or decriminalisation.
None of those words appears, and the site carries no dated posts.
This card has been corrected. What an earlier version of it said, and what was wrong with it, is published in the corrections log.
No score: this candidate has no recorded vote or bill authorship on a cannabis measure. Silence is not a position, so nothing is inferred from it.
Campaign sites and voter guides checked for Neill Snider
Pages read in full:
- onyourballot.vote411.org/m/race-detail.do?id=25559867 — sections on the page: Qualifications; Disaster Recovery; Veterans; Flood Plain Management; Education Funding — the question set the local League of Women Voters chapter wrote for this race, read in full by us on 2026-10-06. Not one of its questions asks about cannabis, hemp or drug policy. The candidate answered, in free text of their own, and no answer of theirs contains, on a word boundary, cannabis, marijuana, marihuana, hemp, hemp-derived, THC, thc-a, CBD, delta-8, delta-9, cannabinoid, dispensary, decriminalisation, psilocybin, Compassionate Use, consumable hemp, SB 3, Senate Bill 3, HB 1325 or HB 46.
- communityimpact.com/central-austin/election/q-a-get-to-know-the-candidates-running-for-texas-land-commissioner — sections on the page: a questionnaire published 2026-09-11 recording that he did not respond before press time to any of its five questions
- www.voteneillsnider.com their own site — sections on the page: the whole of this candidate's own campaign site as this guide read it — 5 pages, reached from the home page’s own links and from the site’s sitemap.xml, each fetched only after its host’s robots.txt had been checked and found to permit it, 7,672 characters of text in all. This row was built on 2026-10-12 out of the sentence above it in this card's own search log, which named the address and said it had been read while the list beside it did not. It records no reading that the log had not already published.
- www.texastribune.org/2026/09/18/texas-land-commissioner-glo-2026-buckingham — sections on the page: The Texas Tribune's guide to the 2026 land commissioner race, published 2026-09-18 and read in full by us on 2026-10-16 (HTTP 200). It names this candidate. No cannabis, marijuana, marihuana, hemp, THC, CBD, delta-8, cannabinoid, dispensary, decriminalisation, psilocybin or Compassionate Use appears anywhere on the page.
All 3 candidates on this ballot are listed.