Texas House, District 93
A Dallas-Fort Worth area district. No candidate on this ballot holds Texas legislative office, so none appears in a 2025 cannabis or hemp roll call. What each candidate has said or answered is listed below in date order, each with its own source. ⚠️A candidate in this race has stopped campaigning, and her name is still printed on both ballots. Ericka Lomick, the Democratic nominee, announced in September 2026 that she had suspended her campaign. The Tarrant County Democratic Party, the party that nominated her, said in a statement dated 22 September 2026: "Ms. Lomick informed party officials, and subsequently the public, that she had suspended her campaign." Her name is printed anyway, because the announcement came after the deadline that could have removed it: the Secretary of State’s election law calendar for this election gives Friday, 21 August 2026 — the 74th day before election day — as the "Last day on which death, declaration of ineligibility, or withdrawal of a party nominee or an independent candidate for the November General Election for state and county officers causes an omission of the candidate’s name from the ballot". Tarrant County Elections Administration has said she will remain on the ballot. The answers shown on her card below were given in February 2026, before that announcement. ⚠️You will see these two names twice on this ballot. The seat is vacant because Nate Schatzline resigned, so the Governor ordered a separate special election, also on November 3, to choose someone to serve out the unexpired term — from November until the new term begins in January 2027. The same two names are printed in both contests, and their records are the ones shown here. For the special election each county draws the order the names are printed in by lot rather than listing them by party, so we do not state an order for it. (Governor’s proclamation, filed with the Secretary of State: www.sos.texas.gov/elections/forms/proclamation-special-election-hd-93.pdf)
No record compiled yet. Nothing on cannabis — no vote, bill, statement or endorsement — was found in any source we could read. 2 limits on that search are recorded with it.
What was checked for Alan Blaylock, and the limits on it
Checked on 2026-09-18: the member-level rolls of every 2025 cannabis and hemp record vote in the official Texas House and Senate Journals — SB 3 and HB 46 in the regular session, SB 5 in the first called session and SB 6 in the second — including every Yea, Nay, present-not-voting, absent and statement-of-vote list, where this name does not appear because they hold no Texas legislative office; the author, joint-author, coauthor and sponsor tables of every cannabis, hemp, THC and Compassionate Use bill filed in the 87th, 88th and 89th Legislatures and the 2025 called sessions, at the Legislature's own bill-lookup service; and a press sweep including the Spectrum News report on the March 2026 Austin candidate forum on THC policy, which quotes six candidates by name and does not include them.
Also checked, and read in full on 2026-09-18: this candidate's Ballotpedia profile at ballotpedia.org/Alan_Blaylock, including any Candidate Connection survey answers published there, which contains no mention of cannabis, marijuana, hemp, THC or CBD.
The candidate's own campaign site was read on 2026-09-20 at www.alanblaylock.com — found by search and confirmed to name this candidate before it was attributed to them. 4 pages were read: the homepage, any JavaScript bundle it loads, and the pages linked from it. None contains cannabis, marijuana, marihuana, hemp, THC, CBD or Compassionate Use.
⚠️This covers the reachable site, not necessarily the whole site: a page that nothing links to cannot be found this way, and at least one Texas candidate keeps their platform on exactly such a page.
Their Ballotpedia profile was read in full on 2026-09-20 at ballotpedia.org/Alan_Blaylock (22732 characters). It contains no occurrence of cannabis, marijuana, marihuana, hemp, THC, CBD, delta-8 or Compassionate Use. When we re-read their Ballotpedia profile on 2026-10-15, it recorded that they completed Ballotpedia’s Candidate Connection survey in 2026; those answers, which they wrote themselves, contain no occurrence of cannabis, marijuana, marihuana, hemp, THC, CBD, delta-8 or Compassionate Use.
The site's own sitemap was read on 2026-09-21, which reaches pages nothing links to. Their campaign site publishes a sitemap listing 8 page(s), of which 7 were read — the sweep skips assets and archive listings rather than prose — and none of those pages contains cannabis, marijuana, marihuana, hemp, THC, CBD or Compassionate Use.
⚠️This card does not tell you whether this candidate held a seat in an earlier Legislature, but the question is now narrower. Read on 2026-10-15, from each chamber’s own journal: the roll of members-elect that the Texas House Journal prints, district by district, on the first day of every regular session from the 75th Legislature (1997) through the 89th (2025), and every senator the Texas Senate Journal names with a district on the first day of every regular session from the 76th (1999) through the 89th.
For the 89th those are journals.house.texas.gov/hjrnl/89r/pdf/89RDAY01FINAL.PDF and journals.senate.texas.gov/SJRNL/89R/HTML/89RSJ01-14-F.HTM and every journal read is listed on this site’s corrections page. No one by this candidate’s name appears in any of them. That is narrower than a negative answer. Those rolls name the members seated as each session opened, and in most years the Senate’s names the senators who were not up for election by surname alone, so a member who sat only in earlier sessions, who arrived at a special election and was never named in full on a later first day, or who served under another name would not be found this way.
If this candidate is one of those, there may be a cannabis voting record this site is missing.
This card has been corrected. What earlier versions of it said, and what was wrong with them, is published in the corrections log.
No score: this candidate has no recorded vote or bill authorship on a cannabis measure. Silence is not a position, so nothing is inferred from it.
Campaign sites and voter guides checked for Alan Blaylock
Pages read in full:
- www.alanblaylock.com their own site — sections on the page: Read 2026-09-20. No cannabis, marijuana, hemp, THC, CBD or Compassionate Use anywhere on the page.
- communityimpact.com/keller-roanoke-northeast-fort-worth/election/qa-meet-the-candidates-running-for-texas-house-district-93 — sections on the page: Read 2026-10-15, HTTP 200. Community Impact's candidate Q&A for the November 2026 election in Texas House District 93, published 2026-09-03. This candidate's answers are printed. The 4 questions put to every candidate were: “Why are you running for this position?”; “What projects are most important for the legislature to focus on for the future of Texas?”; “How do you plan to involve residents in the decision-making process?”; “What do you see as the greatest challenge for Texas in the next five years?”. None of the questions, and none of the answers printed on the page, contains cannabis, marijuana, marihuana, hemp, THC, CBD, delta-8 or Compassionate Use.
How this score is worked out
Seven kinds of act move this number, and they do not count equally. A recorded vote counts 3, and so does authoring a bill or signing an executive action; signing on to somebody else’s bill counts 2. A statement or a questionnaire answer counts 2 as well, and an organisational endorsement counts 1. A vote takes its direction from the bill, whose effect is set out in advance; the rest take it from our reading of what was said, and each one below shows that reading and the reason for it. Acts shown with no number were examined and deliberately left out of the arithmetic, with a reason given.
- 2026-02-16 questionnaire — Answered for clear regulation rather than rushed bans, counted as +2 at weight 2
Average on the −2 to +2 scale: 2. Full method and the bill table.
-
Questionnaire2026-02-03
Answered the Dallas Morning News candidate questionnaire in its 2026 voter guide. The paper asked every candidate in the race: "How do you think the president’s executive order to reclassify marijuana as a Schedule III drug will affect THC regulation in Texas?" The answer given was: "It signals a shift in federal thinking and could expand medical research and access, but it does not automatically change Texas law in my opinion.
Any real impact on THC regulation in Texas would still depend on action by the Texas Legislature and state regulators."
This answer is shown but not scored: the question asks what the candidate expects to happen, and this reply describes an expectation without stating a position of their own on lawful access.
WeedVoter’s note — shown here, but deliberately left out of the score: An account of what federal rescheduling signals and what it does not change in Texas law, stating no position of her own.
-
Questionnaire2026-02-16
Answered the Fort Worth Report candidate questionnaire question "What is your stance on banning or regulating THC products?", published 2026-02-16: "I believe THC products should be handled with clear, responsible regulation that prioritizes safety, honesty in labeling, and youth protection, rather than rushed bans that create confusion and harm consumers."
All 2 candidates on this ballot are listed.