WeedVoter

Tanya Lloyd Democrat

US House, District 27

About this race: A US House seat on the 120th Congress map, covering all of Austin, Caldwell, Calhoun, Colorado, Fayette, Jackson, Matagorda, Victoria, Washington and Wharton counties, nearly all of Bastrop County, most of Aransas County, part of east Nueces County, part of east Hays County, part of south-east Travis County, part of east Refugio County and part of south-east San Patricio County. The records on the race page are votes and cosponsorships in Congress, listed in date order, each with its own source.

Whose record this page shows. The paragraph above is about the race, not about this candidate in particular. Everything after this line on this page is Tanya Lloyd’s own record and nothing else — including, where it says so, the finding that no record was located. No cannabis record is listed on this page for Tanya Lloyd, so where the paragraph above points at records, it is pointed at the race page and not at this one. Every record the paragraph above describes is set out candidate by candidate on the US House, District 27 race page.

Which map this is. This seat is drawn on the 120th Congress map, the one on the 3 November ballot. Measured by area — not by population — 40% of it was inside district 27 on the 119th Congress map, which stands until the end of 2026; the rest came from district 10 (33%), district 22 (24%), district 35 (1.8%) and district 21 (1.4%). So where a candidate below is badged as holding seat 27 today, that badge means the seat number on this ballot — not all of the ground the seat now covers. Your own district may have changed number without your address changing. Check your own address in the district finder.

Tanya LloydDemocrat

No record compiled yet. Nothing on cannabis — no vote, bill, statement or endorsement — was found in any source we could read. One limit on that search is recorded with it.

What was checked for Tanya Lloyd, and the limits on it

Checked on 2026-09-18: her campaign site tanyafortx27.com, including its home, issues and biography pages, which contain no mention of cannabis, marijuana, THC or hemp; her branch.vote platform page; her votewiser profile; BallotReady and her FEC filing; the Spectrum News report on the March 2026 Austin candidate forum on THC policy, which quotes six candidates and does not include them; and NORML's Texas guide, which covers sitting legislators only and has no entry for them.

Note that the "Lloyd" appearing in NORML's Texas guide is Representative Lloyd Doggett of District 37, not this candidate. She has held no Texas legislative office, so there is no roll call to search.

Also checked, and read in full on 2026-09-18: this candidate's Ballotpedia profile at ballotpedia.org/Tanya_Lloyd, including any Candidate Connection survey answers published there, which contains no mention of cannabis, marijuana, hemp, THC or CBD.

Their Ballotpedia profile was read in full on 2026-09-20 at ballotpedia.org/Tanya_Lloyd (23950 characters). It contains no occurrence of cannabis, marijuana, marihuana, hemp, THC, CBD, delta-8 or Compassionate Use. They completed a Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey — free-text answers they wrote themselves — and it raises no cannabis subject.

The candidate's own campaign site was found and read on 2026-09-21 at www.tanyafortx27.com — located by search and confirmed to name this candidate before anything was attributed to them. The site publishes a sitemap listing 35 page(s), of which 31 were read, and none of them displays any mention of cannabis, marijuana, marihuana, hemp, THC, CBD or Compassionate Use.

⚠️This card does not tell you whether this candidate held a seat in an earlier Legislature, but the question is now narrower. Read on 2026-10-15, from each chamber’s own journal: the roll of members-elect that the Texas House Journal prints, district by district, on the first day of every regular session from the 75th Legislature (1997) through the 89th (2025), and every senator the Texas Senate Journal names with a district on the first day of every regular session from the 76th (1999) through the 89th.

For the 89th those are journals.house.texas.gov/hjrnl/89r/pdf/89RDAY01FINAL.PDF and journals.senate.texas.gov/SJRNL/89R/HTML/89RSJ01-14-F.HTM and every journal read is listed on this site’s corrections page. No one by this candidate’s name appears in any of them. That is narrower than a negative answer. Those rolls name the members seated as each session opened, and in most years the Senate’s names the senators who were not up for election by surname alone, so a member who sat only in earlier sessions, who arrived at a special election and was never named in full on a later first day, or who served under another name would not be found this way.

If this candidate is one of those, there may be a cannabis voting record this site is missing.

Also checked, and read in full on 2026-10-06: this candidate’s own campaign site at www.tanyafortx27.com — 29 pages, reached from the home page’s own links and from the site’s sitemap.xml, each fetched only after its host’s robots.txt had been checked and found to permit it, 116,657 characters of text in all. The site identifies itself as the campaign of Tanya Lloyd for Congress and names TX-27 and District 27.

The extracted text of those pages contains no occurrence, on a word boundary, of cannabis, marijuana, marihuana, hemp, THC, CBD, Compassionate Use, delta-8, delta-9, dispensary, decriminalize, cannabinoid or psilocybin. A second domain of theirs, www.tanyafortexas.com, was also located on 2026-10-06 and was not read: the site’s robots.txt asks automated tools not to read it, so the page was never fetched.

This card has been corrected. What an earlier version of it said, and what was wrong with it, is published in the corrections log.

No score: this candidate has no recorded vote or bill authorship on a cannabis measure. Silence is not a position, so nothing is inferred from it.

Campaign sites and voter guides checked for Tanya Lloyd

Pages read in full:

  • onyourballot.vote411.org/m/race-detail.do?id=71570689 — sections on the page: Congress needs a kindergarten teacher — the question set the local League of Women Voters chapter wrote for this race, read in full by us on 2026-10-06. Not one of its questions asks about cannabis, hemp or drug policy. The candidate answered, in free text of their own, and no answer of theirs contains, on a word boundary, cannabis, marijuana, marihuana, hemp, hemp-derived, THC, thc-a, CBD, delta-8, delta-9, cannabinoid, dispensary, decriminalisation, psilocybin, Compassionate Use, consumable hemp, SB 3, Senate Bill 3, HB 1325 or HB 46.
  • www.tanyafortx27.com their own site — sections on the page: the whole of this candidate's own campaign site as this guide read it — 29 pages, reached from the home page’s own links and from the site’s sitemap.xml, each fetched only after its host’s robots.txt had been checked and found to permit it, 116,657 characters of text in all. This row was built on 2026-10-12 out of the sentence above it in this card's own search log, which named the address and said it had been read while the list beside it did not. It records no reading that the log had not already published. Read 2026-10-17 in a fresh crawl starting from the homepage: 33 pages read at HTTP 200 (the homepage, the site’s sitemaps, every page it links to one level down, and the pages under its issues and news sections); 1 at HTTP 403 could not be read. No cannabis, marijuana, marihuana, hemp, THC, CBD, delta-8, cannabinoid, rescheduling, Schedule iii, safer Banking or decriminalisation term on a word boundary in the text or the raw page source of any page read. The same crawler, run the same day from each homepage, found the published cannabis planks on three campaign sites used as controls.
  • www.texasnorml.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/2024-Texas-Marijuana-Policy-Primary-Voter-Guide-by-Texas-NORML.pdf — sections on the page: Texas NORML's 2024 Texas Marijuana Policy Voter's Guide, Primary Election Edition, read by us on 2026-10-16 (HTTP 200; on texasnorml.org since 2024-02-26). Texas NORML put questions on cannabis policy to candidates in the March 2024 primaries and printed their answers. It lists this candidate among the Democratic candidates for U.S. House District 27, and every answer box in that row is empty, which the guide's own key defines as "Blank = Did not Respond". ⚠️The table is printed sideways, so the row was matched to the name by its position on the page, not by the order of the extracted text: on page 4 it is the row between Chris Mapp above and Anthony (A.J.) Tristan below, inside the block labelled U.S. Rep. District 27. ⚠️Identity is matched by name, party and district only. This records an unanswered 2024 survey, not a silence of their own choosing.
  • communityimpact.com/bastrop-cedar-creek/election/meet-the-candidates-for-us-house-of-representatives-district-27 — sections on the page: A Community Impact candidate Q&A for this race, published 2026-08-19, printing the candidate’s own answers to the paper’s questions, read in full by us on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200). None of the paper’s questions asks about cannabis, hemp or THC, and no answer of theirs contains cannabis, marijuana, marihuana, hemp, THC, CBD, delta-8, cannabinoid, dispensary, decriminalisation or Compassionate Use.
  • austinvotersguide.org/LWVAA-VG-EN.pdf — sections on the page: The League of Women Voters of the Austin Area’s printed Voters Guide for the 2026-11-03 election (a PDF the publisher’s server dates 2026-10-15), which prints the candidate’s own answers to the League’s questions for this race, read in full by us on 2026-10-17 (HTTP 200). None of the League’s questions asks about cannabis, hemp or THC, and no answer of theirs contains cannabis, marijuana, marihuana, hemp, THC, CBD, delta-8, cannabinoid, dispensary, decriminalisation or Compassionate Use.

Could not be read, so nothing is concluded from them:

  • www.tanyafortexas.com — the site’s robots.txt asks automated tools not to read it, so the page was never fetched

See the whole US House, District 27 race, including every opponent →

Who is paying for this campaign

Campaign finance — Federal Election Commission

Commission candidate H4TX27089, filed as “LLOYD, TANYA W”, principal committee C00859603 (TANYA LLOYD FOR CONGRESS). fec.gov

Everything below covers the reporting period that ended 2026-06-30, as filed with the Commission. These figures lag the filing deadlines: money raised after that date does not appear until the next report is due, so a recent contribution is not missing, it is not yet reportable.

What we could and could not put a label on

Fraction classified: 0%. We examined $32,732 — the 24 largest employer groupings ($11,460) and 3 committee contributions ($21,272) the Commission shows for this committee — and matched $0 of it to one of our own patterns. $32,732 is listed above as unclassified.

What that figure is not. $32,732 is what we examined, not everything this campaign raised: the Commission returns the largest employer groupings rather than every contribution, and contributions too small to be itemised carry no employer at all. Read the classified fraction as a share of what we looked at.

Any grouping of contributors into an industry is weedvoter’s own classification, applied to employer and committee names exactly as filed. The Commission publishes employers and committees; it never publishes industries. OpenSecrets discontinued its public interface in April 2025, so nothing here is an OpenSecrets classification.

Money received is not a position. Everything on this card is money that changed hands. It is not evidence that any contribution influenced any decision, nothing on it is placed beside a roll call, and we make no claim about anyone’s motive. For what Tanya Lloyd has actually done about cannabis, read the record above on this page — the roll calls, the bills that carry their name, and the date of each one, every entry linked to the document it came from. That is the part of this page built to be judged, and it is the part the score is calculated from. No contribution on this card moves that score by a cent.