Junior Ezeonu Democrat

Texas House, District 101

About this race: A Dallas-Fort Worth area district. One candidate is on this ballot — the certified list carries no opponent from any party, and the minor-party sweep that found Libertarian and Green legislative nominees elsewhere in Texas found none here. No candidate on this ballot holds Texas legislative office, so none appears in a 2025 cannabis or hemp roll call. What each candidate has said or answered is listed below in date order, each with its own source.

Junior EzeonuDemocrat

75/100 support for legal access — top band, 67 to 100 thin — one or two records produced this number · 1 of 2 records scored

How this score is worked out

Seven kinds of act move this number, and they do not count equally. A recorded vote counts 3, and so does authoring a bill or signing an executive action; signing on to somebody else’s bill counts 2. A statement or a questionnaire answer counts 2 as well, and an organisational endorsement counts 1. A vote takes its direction from the bill, whose effect is set out in advance; the rest take it from our reading of what was said, and each one below shows that reading and the reason for it. Acts shown with no number were examined and deliberately left out of the arithmetic, with a reason given.

2026-02-16 questionnaire — Answered supporting funded study of THC safety before collectively deciding how to legalise, tax and regulate: a conditional move toward legal access, counted as +1 at weight 2

Average on the −2 to +2 scale: 1. Full method and the bill table.

Questionnaire2026-02-03

Answered the Dallas Morning News candidate questionnaire in its 2026 voter guide. The paper asked every candidate in the race: "How do you think the president’s executive order to reclassify marijuana as a Schedule III drug will affect THC regulation in Texas?" The answer given was: "The major affect the new schedule III drug reclassification has on THC in Texas is that medical marijuana may be more available. Outside of that it will be the responsibility of the state government to alter marijuana law."

This answer is shown but not scored: the question asks what the candidate expects to happen, and this reply describes an expectation without stating a position of their own on lawful access.

WeedVoter’s note — shown here, but deliberately left out of the score: A prediction that medical marijuana may become more available, leaving the question to the Legislature. No position of his own is stated.

dallasnews.com, dallasnews.com
Questionnaire2026-02-16

Answered the Fort Worth Report candidate questionnaire question "What is your stance on banning or regulating THC products?", published 2026-02-16: "I support funding studies into the safety of THC products and the health effects and impacts. From there we can make a collective decision on how to properly legalize, tax and regulate THC products."

fortworthreport.org

See the whole Texas House, District 101 race, including every opponent →

Who is paying for this campaign

Campaign finance — Texas Ethics Commission

We could not match a Commission filer number to this name. The Commission’s list of candidates who have appointed a campaign treasurer carried no single row matching both the surname and the given name on the ballot for this seat, so none was guessed at. Junior Ezeonu may have filed under a different form of their name.

Why there are no figures and no industry breakdown here. Texas does not require a candidate to report a contributor’s employer or occupation — the Commission’s own 2026 guide asks for the amount, the contributor’s name and address, and the date, and that is all. So there is nothing in these filings to group into industries, and we have built no such grouping rather than imply one. Separately, the Commission’s bulk filing archive tells automated readers to stay out of it, and we honour that, so we have read no individual Texas contribution record. Treat the itemised question as unchecked by us, not as checked and found empty.

Search campaign filings at the Texas Ethics Commission (ethics.state.tx.us) → — choose Transaction Type “Contributions” and search by name.

Any grouping of contributors into an industry is weedvoter’s own classification, applied to employer and committee names exactly as filed. The Commission publishes employers and committees; it never publishes industries. OpenSecrets discontinued its public interface in April 2025, so nothing here is an OpenSecrets classification.

Money received is not a position. Everything on this card is money that changed hands. It is not evidence that any contribution influenced any decision, nothing on it is placed beside a roll call, and we make no claim about anyone’s motive. For what Junior Ezeonu has actually done about cannabis, read the record above on this page — the roll calls, the bills that carry their name, and the date of each one, every entry linked to the document it came from. That is the part of this page built to be judged, and it is the part the score is calculated from. No contribution on this card moves that score by a cent.