Texas House, District 67
About this race: A district in the northern suburbs of Dallas-Fort Worth. The sitting member's recorded votes on the 2025 hemp-THC ban and the Compassionate Use Program expansion are listed below in date order, with their record-vote numbers, as the official journals print them.
Whose record this page shows. The paragraph above is about the
race, and part of it describes a different person. Everything after this line on this page is
Jordan Wheatley’s own record and nothing else — including, where it says so, the
finding that no record was located. Every record the paragraph above describes is
set out candidate by candidate on the
Texas House, District 67 race page.
Jordan WheatleyDemocrat
100/100
support for legal access — top band, 67 to 100
thin — one or two records produced this number · 1 of 1 records scored
How this score is worked out
Seven kinds of act move this number, and they do not count equally. A recorded vote
counts 3, and so does authoring a bill or signing an executive action; signing on to
somebody else’s bill counts 2. A statement or a questionnaire answer counts 2 as
well, and an organisational endorsement counts 1. A vote takes its direction from the
bill, whose effect is set out in advance; the rest take it from our reading of what was
said, and each one below shows that reading and the reason for it. Acts shown with no
number were examined and deliberately left out of the arithmetic, with a reason given.
- 2026-02-03 questionnaire — Described himself as a firm supporter of expanding the medical programme and moving toward a regulated recreational market, and called for putting marijuana to a constitutional amendment, counted as +2 at weight 2
-
Questionnaire2026-02-03
Answered the Dallas Morning News candidate questionnaire in its 2026 voter guide. The paper asked every candidate in the race: "How do you think the president’s executive order to reclassify marijuana as a Schedule III drug will affect THC regulation in Texas?" The answer given was: "The President’s move to reclassify marijuana as Schedule III is a long-overdue step toward common sense, but we have to be honest: in Texas, it won't change things overnight.
While the federal government is finally acknowledging that marijuana has legitimate medical uses, Texas still has some of the strictest laws in the country. To me, this is about more than just a policy change; it’s about freedom, healthcare, and state revenue. We are watching billions of dollars in potential tax revenue cross our borders into neighboring states every year, money that could be staying right here to fund our schools and fix our roads."
They continued: "I believe it’s time for Texas to listen to its people. Whether I’m talking to veterans who need medical relief or young families who are tired of seeing people’s lives ruined over minor possession, the message is clear: the current "war" isn't working. If we can trust Texans to make their own decisions about their lives, we should trust them with this. I believe we should put the usage of marijuana up for a constitutional amendment in November 2027."
They continued: "With that, I am a firm supporter of expanding our medical program and moving toward a regulated recreational market that prioritizes safety and local oversight." They continued: "Ultimately, I go back to the idea of local control. I don’t think Austin should be standing in the way of cities that want to prioritize their police resources on violent crime instead of low-level possession. Reclassifying marijuana at the federal level gives us the perfect opening to have a real, adult conversation in the Texas Legislature about personal liberty and the economic benefits of legalization.
It’s time we stop playing politics with a plant and start doing what’s right for Texas families and our state’s bottom line."
dallasnews.com, dallasnews.com
See the whole Texas House, District 67 race, including every opponent →
Who is paying for this campaign
Campaign finance — Texas Ethics Commission
Texas Ethics Commission filer 90481, filed as
“Wheatley, Jordan D.”, treasurer appointment for State Representative, District 67, dated 2025-12-08. The name on the filing is not word-for-word the name on the ballot — both are printed above so you can check the pairing yourself before you rely on it.
Why there are no figures and no industry breakdown here.
Texas does not require a candidate to report a contributor’s employer or occupation —
the Commission’s own 2026 guide asks for the amount, the contributor’s name and
address, and the date, and that is all. So there is nothing in these filings to group into
industries, and we have built no such grouping rather than imply one. Separately, the
Commission’s bulk filing archive tells automated readers to stay out of it, and we
honour that, so we have read no individual Texas contribution record. Treat the itemised
question as unchecked by us, not as checked and found empty.
Read this filer’s own reports at
the Texas Ethics Commission (ethics.state.tx.us) → — choose Transaction Type
“Contributions”, then Search By “Filer ID” and enter
90481. The Commission’s search posts its results, so there
is no direct link to one filer’s page; the number above is what makes it one step
instead of a hunt.
Any grouping of contributors into an industry is weedvoter’s own classification, applied to employer and committee names exactly as filed. The Commission publishes employers and committees; it never publishes industries. OpenSecrets discontinued its public interface in April 2025, so nothing here is an OpenSecrets classification.
Money received is not a position. Everything on this card is money that changed
hands. It is not evidence that any contribution influenced any decision, nothing on it is
placed beside a roll call, and we make no claim about anyone’s motive.
For what Jordan Wheatley has actually done about cannabis, read the record above on this
page — the roll calls, the bills that carry their name, and the date of each one,
every entry linked to the document it came from. That is the part of this page built to be
judged, and it is the part the score is calculated from. No contribution on this card moves
that score by a cent.