Texas House, District 14
About this race: The sitting member's recorded votes on the 2025 hemp-THC ban and the Compassionate Use Program expansion are listed below in date order, with their record-vote numbers, as the official journals print them.
Whose record this page shows. The paragraph above is about the
race, and part of it describes a different person. Everything after this line on this page is
Jeff Miller’s own record and nothing else — including, where it says so, the
finding that no record was located. Every record the paragraph above describes is
set out candidate by candidate on the
Texas House, District 14 race page.
Jeff MillerLibertarian
No score: the record below carries no direction this site is willing to score — an abstention, a vote on a bill whose effect on legal access is genuinely arguable, or a statement that names no position. It is shown in full so you can read it and judge for yourself.
-
Said2026-09-18
Campaign platform, under the heading "Immigration Reform", states: "I also advocate for ending drug prohibition, which fuels cartel violence and dangerous border crossings, ensuring safer, orderly immigration."
⚠️This is not a cannabis position and is recorded here as drug-policy context only: the page names no cannabis, marijuana, hemp, THC or CBD anywhere, and "drug prohibition" is not defined on it. The page carries no date and the Internet Archive holds no capture of it containing this text, so 2026-09-18 is the date the page was read, not a publication date.
WeedVoter’s note — shown here, but deliberately left out of the score: Calls for ending drug prohibition without naming cannabis anywhere on the page, so no direction on cannabis access can be taken from it.
vote-miller.org
See the whole Texas House, District 14 race, including every opponent →
Who is paying for this campaign
Campaign finance — Texas Ethics Commission
We could not match a Commission filer number to this name. The
Commission’s list of candidates who have appointed a campaign treasurer carried no
single row matching both the surname and the given name on the ballot for this seat, so
none was guessed at. Jeff Miller may have filed under a different form of their name.
Why there are no figures and no industry breakdown here.
Texas does not require a candidate to report a contributor’s employer or occupation —
the Commission’s own 2026 guide asks for the amount, the contributor’s name and
address, and the date, and that is all. So there is nothing in these filings to group into
industries, and we have built no such grouping rather than imply one. Separately, the
Commission’s bulk filing archive tells automated readers to stay out of it, and we
honour that, so we have read no individual Texas contribution record. Treat the itemised
question as unchecked by us, not as checked and found empty.
Search campaign filings at the Texas
Ethics Commission (ethics.state.tx.us) → — choose Transaction Type
“Contributions” and search by name.
Any grouping of contributors into an industry is weedvoter’s own classification, applied to employer and committee names exactly as filed. The Commission publishes employers and committees; it never publishes industries. OpenSecrets discontinued its public interface in April 2025, so nothing here is an OpenSecrets classification.
Money received is not a position. Everything on this card is money that changed
hands. It is not evidence that any contribution influenced any decision, nothing on it is
placed beside a roll call, and we make no claim about anyone’s motive.
For what Jeff Miller has actually done about cannabis, read the record above on this
page — the roll calls, the bills that carry their name, and the date of each one,
every entry linked to the document it came from. That is the part of this page built to be
judged, and it is the part the score is calculated from. No contribution on this card moves
that score by a cent.