US House, District 3
About this race: A US House seat on the 120th Congress map, covering all of Delta, Franklin, Hopkins, Morris and Titus counties, most of Collin County and most of Hunt County. The records below are votes and cosponsorships in Congress, listed in date order, each with its own source.
Which map this is. This seat is drawn on the
120th Congress map, the one on the 3 November ballot. Measured by area — not by
population — 39% of it was inside district 3 on the
119th Congress map, which stands until the end of 2026; the rest came from district 4 (33%) and district 1 (28%). So where a candidate below is badged as holding seat 3 today, that badge means the
seat number on this ballot — not all of the ground the seat now covers. Your own
district may have changed number without your address changing.
Check your own address in the district finder.
Evan HuntDemocrat
100/100
support for legal access — top band, 67 to 100
thin — one or two records produced this number · 1 of 1 records scored
How this score is worked out
Seven kinds of act move this number, and they do not count equally. A recorded vote
counts 3, and so does authoring a bill or signing an executive action; signing on to
somebody else’s bill counts 2. A statement or a questionnaire answer counts 2 as
well, and an organisational endorsement counts 1. A vote takes its direction from the
bill, whose effect is set out in advance; the rest take it from our reading of what was
said, and each one below shows that reading and the reason for it. Acts shown with no
number were examined and deliberately left out of the arithmetic, with a reason given.
- 2026-10-07 questionnaire — Answered a publication’s candidate survey saying federal marijuana prohibition should be replaced with state regulation of responsible adult use, citing the STATES 2.0 Act, with testing, labeling and taxation, counted as +2 at weight 2
-
Questionnaire2026-10-07
Answered outreach from The Marijuana Herald for its survey of candidates in all 435 U.S. House races, published 2026-10-07. The publication reports that he supports replacing federal marijuana prohibition with a regulatory approach giving states greater authority over marijuana policy; that he cited the states 2.0 Act as legislation worth building on and said states should be allowed to regulate responsible adult use without Washington imposing a blanket prohibition; and that he called for testing, accurate labeling and taxation while maintaining protections for minors and penalties for impaired driving.
It reports that he criticised felony penalties for certain THC products and said the government should stop putting “bureaucrats between people and their doctors”.
⚠️The source does not date the response. The article is a survey of candidates in all 435 U.S. House races, carries the standing note that it is updated as more responses are received, and gives no date for any individual reply. The date recorded here is the article’s own publication date, taken from its datePublished metadata (2026-10-07T13:16:45+00:00) — the first date on which the response is on the public record, not the date it was given.
⚠️Only the words in quotation marks are printed as his. Everything else above is the publication’s own account of his answer, not his wording. His campaign site at electevanhunt.com states no cannabis, hemp or THC position, and no other source for these answers was located.
themarijuanaherald.com, electevanhunt.com
See the whole US House, District 3 race, including every opponent →
Who is paying for this campaign
Campaign finance — Federal Election Commission
Commission candidate H6TX03234, filed as
“HUNT, EVAN”, principal committee C00902437
(ELECT EVAN HUNT).
fec.gov
Everything below covers the reporting period that ended
2026-06-30, as filed with the Commission. These figures lag the
filing deadlines: money raised after that date does not appear until the next report is due,
so a recent contribution is not missing, it is not yet reportable.
What we could and could not put a label on
-
unclassified
$256,674
not matched by any of our patterns · figures cover through 2026-06-30
Fraction classified: 0%. We examined
$256,674 — the 96 largest employer groupings
($95,345) and 3 committee contributions
($161,329) the Commission shows for this committee — and
matched $0 of it to one of our own patterns.
$256,674 is listed above as unclassified.
What that figure is not. $256,674 is what we examined,
not everything this campaign raised: the Commission returns the largest employer groupings
rather than every contribution, and contributions too small to be itemised carry no
employer at all. Read the classified fraction as a share of what we looked at.
Any grouping of contributors into an industry is weedvoter’s own classification, applied to employer and committee names exactly as filed. The Commission publishes employers and committees; it never publishes industries. OpenSecrets discontinued its public interface in April 2025, so nothing here is an OpenSecrets classification.
Money received is not a position. Everything on this card is money that changed
hands. It is not evidence that any contribution influenced any decision, nothing on it is
placed beside a roll call, and we make no claim about anyone’s motive.
For what Evan Hunt has actually done about cannabis, read the record above on this
page — the roll calls, the bills that carry their name, and the date of each one,
every entry linked to the document it came from. That is the part of this page built to be
judged, and it is the part the score is calculated from. No contribution on this card moves
that score by a cent.