WeedVoter

Erica Gillum Democrat

Texas Senate, District 18

About this race: Runs from west Harris County across a wide rural stretch. The incumbent cosponsored the medical expansion and voted for the hemp restrictions at every stage.

Whose record this page shows. The paragraph above is about the race, and part of it describes a different person. Everything after this line on this page is Erica Gillum’s own record and nothing else — including, where it says so, the finding that no record was located. Every record the paragraph above describes is set out candidate by candidate on the Texas Senate, District 18 race page.

Erica GillumDemocrat
100/100 support for legal access — top band, 67 to 100 thin — one or two records produced this number · 1 of 1 records scored
How this score is worked out

Seven kinds of act move this number, and they do not count equally. A recorded vote counts 3, and so does authoring a bill or signing an executive action; signing on to somebody else’s bill counts 2. A statement or a questionnaire answer counts 2 as well, and an organisational endorsement counts 1. A vote takes its direction from the bill, whose effect is set out in advance; the rest take it from our reading of what was said, and each one below shows that reading and the reason for it. Acts shown with no number were examined and deliberately left out of the arithmetic, with a reason given.

  • 2026-09-09 questionnaire — Chose "Strongly Support" on maintaining a legal hemp marketplace and answered that regulation is preferable to prohibition. The answer also said the Legislature rather than an agency should make the significant decisions, which is a position on how the law is made and not on whether the products stay legal, counted as +2 at weight 2

Average on the −2 to +2 scale: 2. Full method and the bill table.

  • Questionnaire2026-09-09

    Said responsible hemp businesses should be able to operate under transparent rules, and set out a detailed testing and age-limit framework, in the Texas Hemp Business Council’s 2026 candidate questionnaire. The council is a hemp industry trade association; it put twenty questions to 223 candidates for the Texas Legislature and statewide office and publishes the answers it receives in full, without editing. These are the candidate’s own words, submitted by the candidate.

    Asked about the future of hemp in Texas, the answer was, in full: "Responsible Texas businesses should have a fair opportunity to operate under transparent and consistently enforced rules. As the industry evolves, Texas should engage stakeholders and constituents, protect children and consumers, hold bad actors accountable, and ensure significant policy decisions remain with the Legislature." Asked who should be permitted to sell THC, to whom and with what safeguards: "THC-containing products should be sold only through appropriately licensed or registered businesses operating within the authority granted by Texas law.

    Non-medical hemp-derived cannabinoid products should be limited to adults 21 and older, with meaningful age verification at the point of sale. Products should be accurately labeled for cannabinoid content and serving size and subject to independent testing for potency, contaminants, pesticides, heavy metals, residual solvents, and harmful microorganisms. Medical cannabis prescribed through the Texas Compassionate Use Program should remain subject to the separate requirements applicable to patients, physicians, and licensed dispensing organizations.

    Reasonable safeguards should also include child-resistant and tamper-evident packaging, restrictions on marketing designed to appeal primarily to children, appropriate warning labels, traceability, retailer compliance requirements, and meaningful enforcement against businesses that sell unlawful, contaminated, adulterated, or intentionally mislabeled products." On the questionnaire’s fixed-choice questions: on maintaining a legal, regulated hemp marketplace, "Strongly Support"; on whether regulation is preferable to prohibition where a product can be made and sold safely, "Yes"; on retail regulation, "Reasonable statewide licensing/registration".

    The date is the date the council recorded the submission, in Central time.

    texashempbusinesscouncil.com, texashempbusinesscouncil.com, texashempbusinesscouncil.com, texashempbusinesscouncil.com

Who is paying for this campaign

Campaign finance — Texas Ethics Commission

Texas Ethics Commission filer 89913, filed as “Gillum, Erica”, treasurer appointment for State Senator, District 18, dated 2025-08-04.

Why there are no figures and no industry breakdown here. Texas does not require a candidate to report a contributor’s employer or occupation — the Commission’s own 2026 guide asks for the amount, the contributor’s name and address, and the date, and that is all. So there is nothing in these filings to group into industries, and we have built no such grouping rather than imply one. Separately, the Commission’s bulk filing archive tells automated readers to stay out of it, and we honour that, so we have read no individual Texas contribution record. Treat the itemised question as unchecked by us, not as checked and found empty.

Read this filer’s own reports at the Texas Ethics Commission (ethics.state.tx.us) → — choose Transaction Type “Contributions”, then Search By “Filer ID” and enter 89913. The Commission’s search posts its results, so there is no direct link to one filer’s page; the number above is what makes it one step instead of a hunt.

Any grouping of contributors into an industry is weedvoter’s own classification, applied to employer and committee names exactly as filed. The Commission publishes employers and committees; it never publishes industries. OpenSecrets discontinued its public interface in April 2025, so nothing here is an OpenSecrets classification.

Money received is not a position. Everything on this card is money that changed hands. It is not evidence that any contribution influenced any decision, nothing on it is placed beside a roll call, and we make no claim about anyone’s motive. For what Erica Gillum has actually done about cannabis, read the record above on this page — the roll calls, the bills that carry their name, and the date of each one, every entry linked to the document it came from. That is the part of this page built to be judged, and it is the part the score is calculated from. No contribution on this card moves that score by a cent.