WeedVoter

Don Huffines Republican

Comptroller of Public Accounts

About this race: The Comptroller collects taxes. Its Democratic nominee sits in the Texas Senate and has filed cannabis regulation, decriminalisation and constitutional-amendment bills across four legislatures, and voted against the hemp-THC ban. Eleven documented acts in a race nobody would think to check.

Don HuffinesRepublican
75/100 support for legal access — top band, 67 to 100 thin — one or two records produced this number · 2 of 3 records scored
How this score is worked out

Seven kinds of act move this number, and they do not count equally. A recorded vote counts 3, and so does authoring a bill or signing an executive action; signing on to somebody else’s bill counts 2. A statement or a questionnaire answer counts 2 as well, and an organisational endorsement counts 1. A vote takes its direction from the bill, whose effect is set out in advance; the rest take it from our reading of what was said, and each one below shows that reading and the reason for it. Acts shown with no number were examined and deliberately left out of the arithmetic, with a reason given.

  • 2022-01-20 statement — Stated support for expanding medical use and for decriminalisation, alongside stated opposition to full legalisation. Expansive but short of adult use, counted as +1 at weight 1.2
  • 2015-05-07 Texas Compassionate Use Act SB 339 — voted, counted as +1 at weight 0.9

Average on the −2 to +2 scale: 1. Full method and the bill table.

  • Vote2015-05-07

    Texas Senate: recorded Yea, and named in the printed Yeas roll, on third-reading passage of CSSB 339, the bill that created the Texas Compassionate-Use Program for low-THC cannabis, which carried 26 Yeas to 5 Nays. The Senate had passed the bill to engrossment earlier the same day by a viva voce vote in which every member was deemed to have voted Yea except five named Nays.

    journals.senate.texas.gov, capitol.texas.gov

  • Vote2015-05-07

    Texas Senate: recorded Yea, and named in the printed Yeas roll, on the motion to suspend Senate Rule 7.18 and the constitutional rule requiring bills to be read on three several days, so that CSSB 339 could be placed on its third reading and final passage the same day; CSSB 339 is the bill that created the Texas Compassionate-Use Program for low-THC cannabis. The motion, made by Senator Eltife, prevailed 26 Yeas to 5 Nays.

    This is a procedural vote; the third-reading passage that followed it is listed separately.

    WeedVoter’s note — shown here, but not counted in the score: This site does not score procedural motions, such as suspending a rule, postponing, recommitting or reconsidering, because such a motion decides how a bill is handled rather than what it does, and its scoring rules read this record as one.

    journals.senate.texas.gov

  • Said2022-01-20

    At a Republican gubernatorial forum in College Station, asked his position on marijuana in Texas, he said he was against the full legalization of marijuana and that "I am for expanding the medical use of marijuana, and I am for the decriminalization of the laws", adding that he was for equal enforcement of the laws around the state of Texas. The article is dated 2022-01-20 and reports a forum held the previous evening.

    texasscorecard.com

Who is paying for this campaign

Campaign finance — Texas Ethics Commission

We could not match a Commission filer number to this name. The Commission’s list of candidates who have appointed a campaign treasurer carried no single row matching both the surname and the given name on the ballot for this seat, so none was guessed at. Don Huffines may have filed under a different form of their name.

Why there are no figures and no industry breakdown here. Texas does not require a candidate to report a contributor’s employer or occupation — the Commission’s own 2026 guide asks for the amount, the contributor’s name and address, and the date, and that is all. So there is nothing in these filings to group into industries, and we have built no such grouping rather than imply one. Separately, the Commission’s bulk filing archive tells automated readers to stay out of it, and we honour that, so we have read no individual Texas contribution record. Treat the itemised question as unchecked by us, not as checked and found empty.

Search campaign filings at the Texas Ethics Commission (ethics.state.tx.us) → — choose Transaction Type “Contributions” and search by name.

Any grouping of contributors into an industry is weedvoter’s own classification, applied to employer and committee names exactly as filed. The Commission publishes employers and committees; it never publishes industries. OpenSecrets discontinued its public interface in April 2025, so nothing here is an OpenSecrets classification.

Money received is not a position. Everything on this card is money that changed hands. It is not evidence that any contribution influenced any decision, nothing on it is placed beside a roll call, and we make no claim about anyone’s motive. For what Don Huffines has actually done about cannabis, read the record above on this page — the roll calls, the bills that carry their name, and the date of each one, every entry linked to the document it came from. That is the part of this page built to be judged, and it is the part the score is calculated from. No contribution on this card moves that score by a cent.