WeedVoter

Bo French Republican

Railroad Commissioner

About this race: The Railroad Commission regulates oil and gas and has nothing to do with cannabis — which is why this race is easy to miss. Its Democratic nominee sits in the Texas House and filed a bill in both 2023 and 2025 to repeal marijuana offenses outright, alongside votes against the hemp-THC ban. A guide organised by office would never surface that.

Bo FrenchRepublican
25/100 support for legal access — bottom band, 0 to 33 thin — one or two records produced this number · 1 of 1 records scored
How this score is worked out

Seven kinds of act move this number, and they do not count equally. A recorded vote counts 3, and so does authoring a bill or signing an executive action; signing on to somebody else’s bill counts 2. A statement or a questionnaire answer counts 2 as well, and an organisational endorsement counts 1. A vote takes its direction from the bill, whose effect is set out in advance; the rest take it from our reading of what was said, and each one below shows that reading and the reason for it. Acts shown with no number were examined and deliberately left out of the arithmetic, with a reason given.

  • 2016-03-01 questionnaire — The one cannabis item he answered rejects a legal regulated adult market as strongly as the survey allowed. It is -1 and not -2 because the question asked only about legalisation: he was asked nothing about hemp, the medical programme or criminal penalties, so this says nothing about those, counted as -1 at weight 0.6

Average on the −2 to +2 scale: -1. Full method and the bill table.

  • Questionnaire2016-03-01

    Answered "Strongly Disagree" to the statement "Marijuana should be legalized and regulated like tobacco and alcohol." in an iVoterGuide candidate questionnaire. iVoterGuide publishes the answers candidates return to it, and this page carries answers to roughly forty statements, so the questionnaire was completed rather than declined.

    ⚠️Two limits on this entry, both about when and for which race. The answers sit under a different candidacy: iVoterGuide files them against his run for Texas House District 99 in the primary of 2016-03-01, and the page says in terms that the research below it applies to that race only. The page gives no date on which he answered; 2016-03-01 is the election date of the race the answers are filed under, and iVoterGuide publishes before the election it covers, so the answer was given on or before that date.

    Identity: the link to this race rests on iVoterGuide's own candidate record, a single record listing both that 2016 House race and "Bo French – Railroad Commissioner" for the primary, the runoff and the general election of 2026-11-03, all as a Republican in Texas. His profile for the 2026 Railroad Commissioner primary was also read in full and contains no marijuana, THC, cannabis or hemp question at all.

    ivoterguide.com, ivoterguide.com

Who is paying for this campaign

Campaign finance — Texas Ethics Commission

Texas Ethics Commission filer 88180, filed as “French, Bo”, treasurer appointment for Railroad Commissioner, dated 2025-11-12.

Why there are no figures and no industry breakdown here. Texas does not require a candidate to report a contributor’s employer or occupation — the Commission’s own 2026 guide asks for the amount, the contributor’s name and address, and the date, and that is all. So there is nothing in these filings to group into industries, and we have built no such grouping rather than imply one. Separately, the Commission’s bulk filing archive tells automated readers to stay out of it, and we honour that, so we have read no individual Texas contribution record. Treat the itemised question as unchecked by us, not as checked and found empty.

Read this filer’s own reports at the Texas Ethics Commission (ethics.state.tx.us) → — choose Transaction Type “Contributions”, then Search By “Filer ID” and enter 88180. The Commission’s search posts its results, so there is no direct link to one filer’s page; the number above is what makes it one step instead of a hunt.

Any grouping of contributors into an industry is weedvoter’s own classification, applied to employer and committee names exactly as filed. The Commission publishes employers and committees; it never publishes industries. OpenSecrets discontinued its public interface in April 2025, so nothing here is an OpenSecrets classification.

Money received is not a position. Everything on this card is money that changed hands. It is not evidence that any contribution influenced any decision, nothing on it is placed beside a roll call, and we make no claim about anyone’s motive. For what Bo French has actually done about cannabis, read the record above on this page — the roll calls, the bills that carry their name, and the date of each one, every entry linked to the document it came from. That is the part of this page built to be judged, and it is the part the score is calculated from. No contribution on this card moves that score by a cent.