Texas House, District 150
About this race: North Harris County. The incumbent was one of 55 members who jointly offered the SB 3 floor substitute, and voted for both the medical expansion and the hemp-THC ban.
Whose record this page shows. The paragraph above is about the
race, and part of it describes a different person. Everything after this line on this page is
A'Yonna Kellum’s own record and nothing else — including, where it says so, the
finding that no record was located. Every record the paragraph above describes is
set out candidate by candidate on the
Texas House, District 150 race page.
A'Yonna KellumDemocrat
100/100
support for legal access — top band, 67 to 100
thin — one or two records produced this number · 1 of 1 records scored
How this score is worked out
Seven kinds of act move this number, and they do not count equally. A recorded vote
counts 3, and so does authoring a bill or signing an executive action; signing on to
somebody else’s bill counts 2. A statement or a questionnaire answer counts 2 as
well, and an organisational endorsement counts 1. A vote takes its direction from the
bill, whose effect is set out in advance; the rest take it from our reading of what was
said, and each one below shows that reading and the reason for it. Acts shown with no
number were examined and deliberately left out of the arithmetic, with a reason given.
- 2026-10-06 statement — Platform plank calls for decriminalising and legalising marijuana in Texas, which is a position for changing the law rather than a description of it, counted as +2 at weight 2
-
Said2026-10-06
Her campaign site publishes a platform plank headed "END THE WAR on MARIJUANA." The plank reads, in full: "The current criminalization of Marijuana in Texas is a continuation of a systemic barrier that affects the housing, employment, and student aid opportunities of all Texans yet Black Texas Men are disproportionately incarcerated for non-violent offense, and three times more likely to be arrested for Marijuana Possession in comparison to white men though usage rates remain the same.
Decriminalizing & legalizing Marijuana in Texas will allow an increase in revenue for business owners and a decrease in in arrest rates for non-violent citizens, allotting our dedicated law enforcement the time and resources to apprehend more serious offenders." The plank sits among her other issue planks on the same page, which is titled "VOTE 4 KELLUM - TEXAS HOUSE DISTRICT 150". The date is when the page was read, not a publication date: the page carries no date of its own and the Internet Archive holds no capture of this address, so the plank was published by at least 2026-10-06 and we cannot say when it first appeared.
voteforkellum.squarespace.com
See the whole Texas House, District 150 race, including every opponent →
Who is paying for this campaign
Campaign finance — Texas Ethics Commission
Texas Ethics Commission filer 90242, filed as
“Kellum, A'Yonna L.”, treasurer appointment for State Representative, District 150, dated 2025-10-28. The name on the filing is not word-for-word the name on the ballot — both are printed above so you can check the pairing yourself before you rely on it.
Why there are no figures and no industry breakdown here.
Texas does not require a candidate to report a contributor’s employer or occupation —
the Commission’s own 2026 guide asks for the amount, the contributor’s name and
address, and the date, and that is all. So there is nothing in these filings to group into
industries, and we have built no such grouping rather than imply one. Separately, the
Commission’s bulk filing archive tells automated readers to stay out of it, and we
honour that, so we have read no individual Texas contribution record. Treat the itemised
question as unchecked by us, not as checked and found empty.
Read this filer’s own reports at
the Texas Ethics Commission (ethics.state.tx.us) → — choose Transaction Type
“Contributions”, then Search By “Filer ID” and enter
90242. The Commission’s search posts its results, so there
is no direct link to one filer’s page; the number above is what makes it one step
instead of a hunt.
Any grouping of contributors into an industry is weedvoter’s own classification, applied to employer and committee names exactly as filed. The Commission publishes employers and committees; it never publishes industries. OpenSecrets discontinued its public interface in April 2025, so nothing here is an OpenSecrets classification.
Money received is not a position. Everything on this card is money that changed
hands. It is not evidence that any contribution influenced any decision, nothing on it is
placed beside a roll call, and we make no claim about anyone’s motive.
For what A'Yonna Kellum has actually done about cannabis, read the record above on this
page — the roll calls, the bills that carry their name, and the date of each one,
every entry linked to the document it came from. That is the part of this page built to be
judged, and it is the part the score is calculated from. No contribution on this card moves
that score by a cent.